Learning from European Pilot Programs "How would your life change if you received a basic income?" Many people have likely asked themselves this question at some point. However, this question is no longer confined to mere speculation. Results from 'Universal Basic Income (UBI)' experiments currently underway across Europe are being released one after another, demonstrating its potential with data beyond simple imagination. These experiments are attempts to ascertain whether UBI can truly function as a new welfare system to alleviate poverty and ensure a dignified life. This 'innovative solution,' once unfamiliar to us, is increasingly becoming a reality. In Korean society, basic income has been at the center of heated debate for some time. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, as citizens experienced emergency disaster relief funds, voices acknowledging the necessity of basic income grew louder. However, criticisms of its impracticality also persisted. So, is basic income truly a feasible policy? And will the social changes it brings be positive or negative? This column will explore the possibilities and limitations of UBI through various European experimental cases, focusing on Dr. Elena Petrova's latest analysis published on the London School of Economics (LSE) blog. We hope this serves as an opportunity to consider what direction Korea should take in the future. Over the past few years, various European countries, including Finland, Germany, and Spain, have conducted basic income experiments on a limited scale. Finland, from January 2017 to December 2018, provided a basic income of 560 euros (approximately 560,000 won) per month to 2,000 unemployed individuals and analyzed its effects. A representative change observed was an improvement in mental health. Dr. Petrova stated, "Finnish experiment participants experienced an average 23% reduction in stress levels and a 17% decrease in depressive symptoms compared to the control group." Furthermore, a significant number of these participants were observed learning new skills and starting businesses, with small-scale entrepreneurial attempts being 28% higher among them compared to the control group during the experimental period. This shows results contrary to the common concern that "basic income would reduce the motivation to work." Particularly noteworthy is the data on labor market participation rates. Contrary to the concerns of many critics, the employment rate of the group receiving basic income showed almost no difference from the control group. Participants, in fact, responded that "economic security allowed them the leeway to seek better jobs," and indeed, six months after the experiment concluded, employment quality indicators (such as wage levels and contract stability) were, on average, 12% higher for basic income recipients. This suggests that UBI does not simply discourage work but rather provides individuals with the bargaining power to choose better employment. In Germany, a large-scale, three-year basic income experiment launched in June 2021 is drawing attention. This experiment, organized by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), unconditionally provides 1,200 euros (approximately 1.8 million won) per month to 122 participants, tracking changes in their quality of life alongside a comparison group of 1,380 individuals. According to the 2024 interim report, UBI showed effects beyond economic security, strengthening family relationships and social ties. Participants' family satisfaction increased by an average of 18%, and participation in community activities rose by 34%. One participant stated, "As financial burdens decreased, I gained the freedom to focus on other aspects of life. I spent more time with my children and enrolled in a night college course that I had long postponed." This indicates a significant change beyond mere livelihood support, foreshadowing the restoration of social networks. Dr. Petrova emphasizes regarding the German case, "The greatest value of UBI is that it returns choice to people." She analyzes, "While existing welfare systems demand specific behaviors from recipients, UBI allows individuals to design their own lives. This is the core mechanism that simultaneously boosts self-esteem and social participation." The Real-World Effects of UBI Amidst Hopes and Concerns In Spain, the 'Minimum Vital Income (IMV)' scheme was introduced in June 2020 as part of the COVID-19 pandemic response, which is regarded as a quasi-basic income experiment focusing on middle-to-low-income households. Analyzing data up to 2025 revealed a surprising finding: 72% of participating households tended to invest additional income in education or child-rearing. Specifically, spending on children's education increased by an average of 41%, and adult participants' enrollment in vocational training programs rose by 56%. This serves as concrete evidence that basic income can stimulate investment in the future for low-income individual
Related Articles