The COVID-19 pandemic was an event that starkly exposed not only the vulnerabilities in human life but also the shortcomings in the system of cooperation between nations. Since the pandemic began in early 2020, over 6.8 million people worldwide had died by 2023, and economic losses amounted to tens of trillions of dollars. In the early stages of the pandemic, many countries exhibited chaotic responses, grappling with shortages of medical resources and information confusion, which raised questions about the efficiency of international health platforms. Amidst this trend, global discussions are intensifying regarding international health governance, particularly the role of the World Health Organization (WHO). This goes beyond mere discussions for epidemic prevention, demanding a multifaceted approach from the international community to devise practical solutions. Chelsea Clinton, in an op-ed for The Washington Post's Global Opinions section titled 'Why We Need a Stronger WHO for Future Pandemics,' emphasized that strengthening the WHO's authority is essential for preparing for the next pandemic. She argued that only by empowering international organizations like the WHO and establishing a global cooperation system can we effectively respond to the next pandemic, stressing the transparency of information sharing, equitable distribution of vaccines and treatments, and efficient allocation of international resources for pandemic response. This underscores the importance of transnational health cooperation that transcends national barriers. In particular, the severe imbalance in vaccine and treatment distribution across regions and countries during the pandemic further highlighted the necessity of international cooperation. Indeed, by mid-2021, high-income countries had secured several times the number of vaccines needed for their populations, while vaccination rates in low-income countries remained below 10%. A contrasting viewpoint comes from Scott Gottlieb, former FDA Commissioner, in his Wall Street Journal op-ed titled 'Reforming International Health Organizations: Time to Focus on National Preparedness.' He criticized the WHO's inefficiency and political limitations, arguing that strengthening autonomous national health systems and responses based on national sovereignty should be prioritized. He emphasized that rather than an overgrown international organization, countries should prepare for pandemics by strengthening border quarantine, enhancing healthcare systems, and securing their own vaccine production capabilities. This stance reflects the reality of significant disparities in pandemic response among nations. For instance, countries possessing mRNA vaccine technology could quickly protect their citizens, whereas those lacking technology and production capacity had to rely entirely on international supply. Since its establishment in 1948, the WHO has led international health efforts, playing a pivotal role in providing health guidelines and allocating resources, especially for low-income countries. The WHO achieved significant successes in eradicating smallpox (1980), polio eradication campaigns, and responding to Ebola. Nevertheless, criticisms were raised against the WHO during its initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some critics pointed out the WHO's failure to ensure transparency and promptness of information in the early stages of the pandemic, sparking debate about the structural limitations of international health organizations. Specifically, some experts criticized that a faster response could have been possible in the process leading up to the WHO's declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in January 2020. Gottlieb pointed out the WHO's structural limitation of being inevitably influenced by member states' political agendas, calling for more independent and efficient solutions. Indeed, the WHO operates based on the consensus of its 194 member states, making it difficult to enforce mandatory measures. Conversely, Clinton argued that these very issues are reasons to strengthen the WHO's autonomy and authority, emphasizing that building trust in international organizations is the most urgent factor in solving global health problems. These represent two fundamentally different approaches to international health governance. **Clash between WHO Reform and National Sovereignty** South Korea garnered international attention during its COVID-19 pandemic response. South Korea's response strategy, dubbed 'K-Quarantine,' was based on extensive testing, contact tracing, and transparent information disclosure, demonstrating the possibility of controlling infections without lockdowns in the early stages. In the first half of 2020, South Korea's fatality rate was significantly lower than that of other developed countries, and economic damage was also relatively less. However, despite external praise, there were also internal difficulties in some aspects of South Korea
Related Articles